![]() So in the case of the elephants again, if Larry said to me "I saw an elephant in the supermarket" (and let's just say that Larry lives in Brisbane, Queensland) it would be very very unlikely that there are elephants walking down the aisles of supermarkets in Brisbane, Queensland in particular. what we know about one particular thing, can a lot of the time be applied to similar other things across the board.Īs for coherence theory of truth - is this where we make a decision on something based on what we already know about something. In the same vein, most anything big and heavy can cause damage to things in the environment, they definitely move slowly and so on. It's well understood that elephants are extremely big and heavy creatures, and an elephant being big and heavy has the potential to cause great damage to things in a variety of ways. Hi guys, was just wondering if someone could offer me an explanation of these two theories if possible!Įdit: so for the correspondence theory of truth I'll provide an example as I'm not sure how to put into words what it actually means. We compiled a list of valuable resources for grad school applications which you can find here. Philosophy: Philosophy | AcademicPhilosophy | Self-Posts / Test-My-Theory | Aesthetics | Bioethics | ContinentalTheory | PhilosophyOfMath | Neurophilosophy | PoliticalPhilosophy | PhilosophyOfReligion | PhilosophyOfScience | TheAgora | PhilosophyEvents Resources for PhD applications Level of involvement: (indicated by color) Autodidact Graduate PhD Professional Undergraduate Related Field Related subreddits:Īsk: AskReddit | AskAcademia | AskComputerScience | AskCulinary | AskElectronics | AskEngineers | AskHistorians | AskLiteraryStudies | AskReligion | AskScience | AskSciTech | AskStatistics You can also find information about applying for flair at that page. You can find the details of our flair system here. As philosophical issues are often complicated and have potentially thousands of years of research to sift through, knowing when someone is an expert in a given area can be important in helping understand and weigh the given evidence. The purpose of flair on /r/askphilosophy is to indicate commenters' relevant expertise in philosophical areas and research. You can find a full list of the subreddit rules here. for a particular answer.Īll other comments are off-topic and will be removed. not from commenters who don't understand the state of the research on the question)Ĭomments other than answers on /r/askphilosophy should be one of the following:įollow-up questions related to the OP's questionįollow-up questions to a particular answerĭiscussion of the accuracy of a particular answer not inaccurate or false)Ĭome only from those with relevant knowledge of the question (i.e. not one-liners or otherwise uninformative)Īccurately portray the state of research and literature (i.e. arguments in philosophy, philosophers' positions, the state of the field (not questions about commenters' opinions) not extremely broad to the point of unanswerability) ![]() Specific enough to reasonably be answered (i.e. not merely tangentially related to philosophy) Questions on /r/askphilosophy should be:ĭistinctly philosophical (i.e. Also check the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy and Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. r/askphilosophy is not a debate or discussion subreddit.Ĭheck our FAQs for a list of frequently asked questions to see if your question has already been answered. Please have a look at our rules and guidelines. r/askphilosophy is thus a place to ask and answer philosophical questions. We envision this subreddit as the philosophical counterpart to /r/AskHistorians, which is well-known for its high quality answers to historical questions. r/askphilosophy aims to provide serious, well-researched answers to philosophical questions. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |